Active Unanswered
Re - Building Transom
Moderators: Don Ayers, Al Benton, Don Vogt
Re - Building Transom
I am rebuilding my transom and would like to know is it better to use solid wood and try to bend it to get that 4 inch curve in it or can I Laminate pieces together to make it easier to make the curve ?
- offshorespars
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 11:34 am
- Location: Harsens Island, MI
- Contact:
Re: Re - Building Transom
If you are speaking about the transom bow (the aft most piece that the ends of the bottom planks fasten to) I would suggest steaming bending white oak if that is what was used originally. Oak does not laminate well. I am not certain if the 1950 Riviera used oak for the transom bow but assume so. If the transom bow is mahogany then I would say you could laminate.
Mike
Mike
1978 30' CC Sportsman
1948 22' CC Sportsman
1948 22' CC Sportsman
Re: Re - Building Transom
Thanks Mike,they did use white oak
Re: Re - Building Transom
This piece is one of the most stressed in the framework of the boat. It has a lot of twisting force applied to it as it moves through the water from the prop and forces applied as the rudder swings the stern from side to side. Go over a big wake and the longitudinal forces from bow to stern are trying to twist this laterally. Couple that with the inevitable condition of water in the bilge washing aft to this piece and probably 100 or so fasteners screwed into it . Solid wood would have to be selected for quality straight grain, no knots and be successfully bent accordingly with no cracks. Laminated oak with alternating grain directions would probably produce the strongest piece and of course would be easier to bend to shape. This piece, like all framework should be sealed well and securely bedded to keep rot away.
1966 Lyman Cruisette 25 foot "Serenity Now!"
1953 Chris Craft Sportsman 22 foot "Summerwind"
1953 Chris Craft Sportsman 22 foot "Summerwind"
- maritimeclassics
- Posts: 700
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 4:35 pm
- Location: Traverse City, Mi
- Contact:
Re: Re - Building Transom
I usually cut it out of one piece of oak or mahogany. It may cost a bit more for materials but it saves us time in cutting, soaking, steaming and then finishing fit to the boat. There is no stress to the wood if you cut it out of one. I have laminated a top piece of mahogany on oak but it depends on the boat and how the crown of the deck is.
Family member of Chris Craft founder
Owner of Maritime Classics
http://www.maritimeclassics.com
Ph# 231-486-6148
Restoration Projects:
1936 25' Gar Wood Custom
1947 Ventnor Hydroplane
1957 17' Deluxe Runabout
1948 25' Chris Craft Sportsman Twin
1959 19' Sliver Arrow Hull #75
1929 26' Chris Craft Custom Runabout
1937 25' Chris Craft Custom Runabout
Owner of Maritime Classics
http://www.maritimeclassics.com
Ph# 231-486-6148
Restoration Projects:
1936 25' Gar Wood Custom
1947 Ventnor Hydroplane
1957 17' Deluxe Runabout
1948 25' Chris Craft Sportsman Twin
1959 19' Sliver Arrow Hull #75
1929 26' Chris Craft Custom Runabout
1937 25' Chris Craft Custom Runabout
- steve bunda
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 5:59 pm
- Location: wisconsin
- Contact:
Re: Re - Building Transom
I cut the bottom transom frame out of a solid piece of mahogany, African is easier to find in 8/4 to 12/4. This method is faster and takes away the worry of future spring back. My second choice would be a laminated frame as Century or Shepard did.
- robertpaul
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 2:35 pm
- Contact:
Re: Re - Building Transom
My transom bow was severely deteriorated as was the bent oak plank behind it. I decided to laminate a new one out of dark red merit because it was available from a trusted supplier, it glues very well and it will hold fasteners. Here are a few pics with the piece dry fitted. You can see the new piece of oak that I steam bent and used to replace the original that was 80% gone. I have since treated and painted both and the fit is quite satisfactory to me.
1937 35' Double Stateroom Enclosed Cruiser
- robertpaul
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 2:35 pm
- Contact:
Re: Re - Building Transom
First pic didn't make it.... I'll try again
1937 35' Double Stateroom Enclosed Cruiser
Re: Re - Building Transom
Very nice work! I did the same repair on my 1948 Double Stateroom a few years back. That's an area thats always a problem on the old cruisers. The cockpit hatches tend to leak when it rains and water sits back there. I made sure my cockpit is water tight so it won't happen again any time soon. It's a lot of work making those bends. Thanks for the photos.
- steve bunda
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 5:59 pm
- Location: wisconsin
- Contact:
Re: Re - Building Transom
Very Good and Nice, that will hold well. We have in stock the light red Meranti, it has a little less silica in it, thus not as brittle.
-
- Posts: 2092
- Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 10:41 pm
- Location: Powhatan Courthouse Virginia
- Contact:
Re: Re - Building Transom
I firmly believe in laminating and with 5200.....just my pref
Way strong and simpler
John in Va
Way strong and simpler
John in Va
1980 Fairchild Scout 30
19?? custom Argentine Runabout 16'
1954 Whirlwind deluxe dual ckpt 16'
1921 Old Town Charles River 17' (founding Captain, James River Batteau Festival)
19?? custom Argentine Runabout 16'
1954 Whirlwind deluxe dual ckpt 16'
1921 Old Town Charles River 17' (founding Captain, James River Batteau Festival)
- robertpaul
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 2:35 pm
- Contact:
Re: Re - Building Transom
To this point I have found that laminating or scarfing with epoxy yields a pretty good bond. Even sorting through many boards of dark red meranti at my supplier, I found it challenging to get the consistency I was looking for. Consequently every new frame is laminated from two pieces of stock and planed to the proper thickness. I have redone 2/3 of both chines the same way and I found it quite straightforward. Laminating is strong and yields a nice, exact compound curve. I know that with my limited skills, trying to bend a solid piece would be a test. As for 5200, I used it for the scarf joint between the new chine and the original. It does a great job in that application, and I agree that it would be excellent for laminating as well. One reason I prefer epoxy for laminating is that I have very little product left over to harden in the cup. After doing the chine scarf with 5200, I was left with 1/2 tube that is now cured and stares at me from the corner of the dome shelter. I built the new chines one layer at a time. Working by myself, trying to get everything glued up, mounted and clamped in one shot would have been a fright show. Consequently I wasted very little glue. Here is a pic of the stbd chine dry fitted. That little piece of pine you see screwed to the frame is simply there to provide a square surface for clamping.
1937 35' Double Stateroom Enclosed Cruiser
Re: Re - Building Transom
You can not compare a bond with epoxy to one with 5200 or SikaFlex. Epoxy is many, many times stronger and bonds to wood in a molecular manner that other glues simply don't. Epoxy is also ideal to close end wood. One way I learned to make epoxy penetrate better, especially if there is some soft spots, is to warm up the spot carefully with the heat gun, apply laminating epoxy and warm a little more, not to exceed 50C. Repeat until epoxi stops go into the wood... This method should be better than using epoxi with thinners, since when it warms up the viscosity goes down to less than water. Also using epoxi fillers or thickened with micro ballons, it will form a extremely strong bond, even if there is a gap between the pieces. Note that epoxi is about five times stronger than polyester...
Cavalier 36' Seastrake 1967 "CillaGreta III"
http://chris-craft.org/registry/viewboa ... at_id=2318
http://chris-craft.org/registry/viewboa ... at_id=2318
-
- Posts: 2092
- Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 10:41 pm
- Location: Powhatan Courthouse Virginia
- Contact:
Re: Re - Building Transom
disagree with the previous post.
The epoxy is certainly "stronger" if by that you mean harder and less (totally) flexible....and in many boat applications that is not what you want. Each has its place....one is not the answer. IMHO....backed by lots of experience.....
John in Va.
The epoxy is certainly "stronger" if by that you mean harder and less (totally) flexible....and in many boat applications that is not what you want. Each has its place....one is not the answer. IMHO....backed by lots of experience.....
John in Va.
1980 Fairchild Scout 30
19?? custom Argentine Runabout 16'
1954 Whirlwind deluxe dual ckpt 16'
1921 Old Town Charles River 17' (founding Captain, James River Batteau Festival)
19?? custom Argentine Runabout 16'
1954 Whirlwind deluxe dual ckpt 16'
1921 Old Town Charles River 17' (founding Captain, James River Batteau Festival)
Re: Re - Building Transom
John in VA; With all respect, but you are not up to date with epoxi products. The idea that epoxi is completely stiff material is a misunderstanding, some laminating epoxies where, but now a days there is products with flexibility but with the strength. I absolutely prefer epoxi before polyurethane glues, to epoxi's better flex, specially when laminating wood that is to be used in a damp environment. One problem with one part products like 5200 or Sikaflex, is that they age much faster than a correct blended epoxi and tend to over age dry out the wood they are attached to. Not to say they are bad products, but for permanent fastening, I go epoxi seven days a week!
Cavalier 36' Seastrake 1967 "CillaGreta III"
http://chris-craft.org/registry/viewboa ... at_id=2318
http://chris-craft.org/registry/viewboa ... at_id=2318
-
- Posts: 2092
- Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 10:41 pm
- Location: Powhatan Courthouse Virginia
- Contact:
Re: Re - Building Transom
It is absolutely true that I am not up to date with the newest products.
Old school to the core.
you mention the brand names, 5200 and sika.......so what epoxy?
thanks,
John in Va
Old school to the core.
you mention the brand names, 5200 and sika.......so what epoxy?
thanks,
John in Va
1980 Fairchild Scout 30
19?? custom Argentine Runabout 16'
1954 Whirlwind deluxe dual ckpt 16'
1921 Old Town Charles River 17' (founding Captain, James River Batteau Festival)
19?? custom Argentine Runabout 16'
1954 Whirlwind deluxe dual ckpt 16'
1921 Old Town Charles River 17' (founding Captain, James River Batteau Festival)
Re: Re - Building Transom
As I'm in Sweden, I use a Swedish brand Epotex/ Nils Malmgren. They have been working with epoxi for both marine as well as construction applications since late 60''s. They have a range of products, of one I will use for sealing the deck is called 705 elastic, which is specially formulated for joints with much movement and vibrations along with high loads, as keels on sailing boats or even concrete constructions.
Cavalier 36' Seastrake 1967 "CillaGreta III"
http://chris-craft.org/registry/viewboa ... at_id=2318
http://chris-craft.org/registry/viewboa ... at_id=2318
Re: Re - Building Transom
John,
I need to also disagree with you. 5200 remains flexible which is why it is good for certain tasks like bottom planks. It is a very poor choice for laminating multiple thin(er) pieces of wood into a single structural member. A properly laminated piece will be much stronger than one that is steam bent or cut from a single block of wood. It will be a lot more work though.
I need to also disagree with you. 5200 remains flexible which is why it is good for certain tasks like bottom planks. It is a very poor choice for laminating multiple thin(er) pieces of wood into a single structural member. A properly laminated piece will be much stronger than one that is steam bent or cut from a single block of wood. It will be a lot more work though.
-
- Posts: 2092
- Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 10:41 pm
- Location: Powhatan Courthouse Virginia
- Contact:
Re: Re - Building Transom
Mr. Bacon,
While I hope to be with you in Tavares to thrash this out further:
Lamination is a multiple choice deal.
I you can laminate a component in a fixed position...outside of the hull...like on the bench...and you want it to be properly penetrated etc....then the goop may be the best way to go.
BUT: some of the big cruiser jobs, with which I am most familiar, require lamination in place. Like making large sistering ribs for instance.
If you try to add one say 1/8" to 3/16" strips of say 2 " width...in a build up and screw and glue fashion.(stacking)..which is the best way to do it.
Then the epoxy goop is much more difficult to work with and IMHO still not a bit better and perhaps a bit worse than the 5200 method. Different strokes for different blokes.....
See you in Florida? Hope to.
John in Va.
While I hope to be with you in Tavares to thrash this out further:
Lamination is a multiple choice deal.
I you can laminate a component in a fixed position...outside of the hull...like on the bench...and you want it to be properly penetrated etc....then the goop may be the best way to go.
BUT: some of the big cruiser jobs, with which I am most familiar, require lamination in place. Like making large sistering ribs for instance.
If you try to add one say 1/8" to 3/16" strips of say 2 " width...in a build up and screw and glue fashion.(stacking)..which is the best way to do it.
Then the epoxy goop is much more difficult to work with and IMHO still not a bit better and perhaps a bit worse than the 5200 method. Different strokes for different blokes.....
See you in Florida? Hope to.
John in Va.
1980 Fairchild Scout 30
19?? custom Argentine Runabout 16'
1954 Whirlwind deluxe dual ckpt 16'
1921 Old Town Charles River 17' (founding Captain, James River Batteau Festival)
19?? custom Argentine Runabout 16'
1954 Whirlwind deluxe dual ckpt 16'
1921 Old Town Charles River 17' (founding Captain, James River Batteau Festival)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests